<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="WordPress/2.9.2" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>PsyDir</title>
	<link>http://www.psydir.com</link>
	<description>Psychology &#38; Psychotherapy Resources</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:12:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>psychology?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[
dully_1g asked: i want to study psychology when i go to college
why kind of knowledge should i have? is stuyding psychology easy? and the other thing is, this morning, i heard psychology is somehow related ...]]></description>
		<link>http://www.psydir.com/psychqa/psychology-4</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Happiness as Stable Extraversion: Internal Consistency Reliability and Construct Validity of the Oxford Happiness Questionnaire Among Undergraduate Students</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="abstract"><div class="Abstract" lang="en"><a name="Abs1"></a><span class="AbstractHeading">Abstract&#160;&#160;</span><div class="normal">The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire (OHQ) was developed by Hills and Argyle (<cite>2002</cite>) to provide a more accessible equivalent measure of the Oxford Happiness Inventory (OHI). The aim of the present study was
 to examine the internal consistency reliability, and construct validity of this new instrument alongside the Eysenckian dimensional
 model of personality. The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire was completed by a sample of 131 undergraduate students together
 with the abbreviated form of the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. The data demonstrated good internal consistency
 reliability (alpha = .92) and good construct validity in terms of positive association with extraversion (<i>r</i> = .38 <i>p</i> &#60; .001) and negative association with neuroticism (<i>r</i> = −.57 <i>p</i> &#60; .001). The kind of happiness measured by the OHQ is clearly associated with stable extraversion.
 </div>
 </div></p><ul>
	<li><span class="labelName">Content Type </span><span class="labelValue">Journal Article</span></li><li>DOI 10.1007/s12144-010-9076-8</li><li><span class="labelName">Authors</span><ul>
		<li>Mandy Robbins, University of Warwick Coventry England UK</li><li>Leslie J. Francis, University of Warwick Coventry England UK</li><li>Bethan Edwards, Bangor University Bangor Wales UK</li>
	</ul></li>
</ul><ul class="parents">
	<ul class="details">
		<li><span class="header labelName">Journal </span><span class="labelValue"><a href="http://www.metapress.com/content/103878/">Current Psychology</a></span></li><li><span class="labelName">Online ISSN </span><span class="labelValue">1936-4733</span></li><li><span class="labelName">Print ISSN </span><span class="labelValue">1046-1310</span></li>
	</ul>
</ul>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.psydir.com/journals/happiness-as-stable-extraversion-internal-consistency-reliability-and-construct-validity-of-the-oxford-happiness-questionnaire-among-undergraduate-students</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>An Application of Affective Events Theory to Workplace Bullying</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="abstract">Within the framework of Affective Events Theory (AET), this study examines
 emotional experiences as a potential mediator between exposure to bullying and
 job satisfaction and intention to leave, respectively. We also investigate to
 what extent trait anxiety and trait anger moderate the relationships between
 these variables. The results show that the relationships between bullying and
 both job satisfaction and intentions to leave are partly mediated by the
 targets’ emotional experiences. Trait anxiety moderates the
 relationship between exposure to bullying and the targets’ negative
 emotions. Trait anxiety and trait anger did not moderate the relationship
 between bullying and the outcomes. The results support the validity of AET,
 while simultaneously indicating exposure to bullying as a strong stressor in its
 own right.</p><ul>
	<li><span class="labelName">Content Type </span><span class="labelValue">Journal Article</span></li><li>Category Original Articles and Reviews</li><li>DOI 10.1027/1016-9040/a000026</li><li><span class="labelName">Authors</span><ul>
		<li>Lars Glasø, University of Bergen, Norway</li><li>Tina Løkke Vie, University of Bergen, Norway</li><li>Gry Rotnes Holmdal, University of Bergen, Norway</li><li>Ståle Einarsen, University of Bergen, Norway</li>
	</ul></li>
</ul><ul class="parents">
	<ul class="details">
		<li><span class="header labelName">Journal </span><span class="labelValue"><a href="http://www.metapress.com/content/120230/">European Psychologist</a></span></li><li><span class="labelName">Print ISSN </span><span class="labelValue">1016-9040</span></li>
	</ul>
</ul>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.psydir.com/journals/an-application-of-affective-events-theory-to-workplace-bullying</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Construct-Driven Development of a Video-Based Situational Judgment Test for Integrity</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="abstract">In a field study conducted in a multi-ethnic selection setting at the Dutch
 police, we examined the construct validity of a video-based situational judgment
 test (SJT) aimed to measure the construct of integrity. Integrity is of central
 importance to productive work performance of police officers. We used a sample
 of police applicants, which consisted of a Dutch ethnic majority group and an
 ethnic minority group. The ethnic minority applicants came from one of the four
 largest ethnic minority groups in The Netherlands, namely groups with a Dutch
 Antillean, a Moroccan, a Surinamese, or a Turkish background. A critical issue
 is the often-found construct-heterogeneity of SJTs. However, we found that a
 construct-driven approach may be fruitful in the development of SJTs aiming to
 measure one single construct. Confirming our expectations, we found support for
 the construct validity of the SJT intended to measure the construct of
 integrity. These results held across ethnic majority and ethnic minority
 applicants. Therefore, the SJT is a promising test for personnel selection in a
 multi-ethnic setting.</p><ul>
	<li><span class="labelName">Content Type </span><span class="labelValue">Journal Article</span></li><li>Category Original Articles and Reviews</li><li>DOI 10.1027/1016-9040/a000027</li><li><span class="labelName">Authors</span><ul>
		<li>Lonneke A. L. de Meijer, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands</li><li>Marise Ph. Born, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands</li><li>Jaap van Zielst, Police Academy of The Netherlands, Apeldoorn, The
 Netherlands</li><li>Henk T. van der Molen, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands</li>
	</ul></li>
</ul><ul class="parents">
	<ul class="details">
		<li><span class="header labelName">Journal </span><span class="labelValue"><a href="http://www.metapress.com/content/120230/">European Psychologist</a></span></li><li><span class="labelName">Print ISSN </span><span class="labelValue">1016-9040</span></li>
	</ul>
</ul>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.psydir.com/journals/construct-driven-development-of-a-video-based-situational-judgment-test-for-integrity</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Psychology in Outerspace</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="abstract">Previous work has shown that is important to consider the disjunction between
 paranormal and nonparanormal beliefs about extraterrestrial life. The current
 study examined the association between both such beliefs and individual
 difference and demographic variables. A total of 555 British participants
 completed the Extraterrestrial Beliefs Scale, as well as measures of their Big
 Five personality scores, social conformity, sensation seeking, and demographics.
 Results showed no sex differences in ratings of paranormal and nonparanormal
 extraterrestrial beliefs, but participants rated nonparanormal beliefs more
 positively than paranormal beliefs. Results of structural equation modeling
 showed that individual difference factors (specifically, Openness,
 Conscientiousness, and social conformity) explained 21% of the
 variance in extraterrestrial beliefs, whereas demographic factors (specifically,
 education level, political orientation, and religiosity) explained
 16% of the variance. Limitations and directions for future work are
 considered.</p><ul>
	<li><span class="labelName">Content Type </span><span class="labelValue">Journal Article</span></li><li>Category Original Articles and Reviews</li><li>DOI 10.1027/1016-9040/a000023</li><li><span class="labelName">Authors</span><ul>
		<li>Viren Swami, Department of Psychology, University of Westminster,
 London, UK</li><li>Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic, Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London,
 UK</li><li>Manal Shafi, Department of Psychology, University of Westminster,
 London, UK</li>
	</ul></li>
</ul><ul class="parents">
	<ul class="details">
		<li><span class="header labelName">Journal </span><span class="labelValue"><a href="http://www.metapress.com/content/120230/">European Psychologist</a></span></li><li><span class="labelName">Print ISSN </span><span class="labelValue">1016-9040</span></li>
	</ul>
</ul>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.psydir.com/journals/psychology-in-outerspace</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Narcissism and Perceived Inequity in Attractiveness in Romantic Relationships</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="abstract">In three studies of romantic relationships (<i>N</i> = 253,
 <i>N</i> = 81, and <i>N</i> = 98) the hypothesis was
 tested that high narcissists, relative to low narcissists, distort the
 assessment of equity in attractiveness. Narcissism was measured by the
 Narcissistic Personality Inventory. In Study 1 the hypothesis was confirmed. In
 Study 2 it was shown that although narcissism correlated significantly with
 self-esteem, it was the unique variance in narcissism which predicted the
 tendency to feel underbenefited in respect to attractiveness. Finally in Study
 3, dyadic data were analyzed on the basis of the Actor-Partner Interdependence
 Model. The data of 49 couples who lived together were included. The dyadic
 analysis indicated that actor narcissism exerted the expected influence on
 perceived inequity in attractiveness, whereas partner narcissism explained no
 additional variance. High narcissists felt more underbenefited than low
 narcissists. The analysis of dyadic data in Study 3 indicates that the link
 between narcissism and equity in attractiveness turns out to be an intrapersonal
 phenomenon because only actor narcissism, not partner narcissism, is
 significantly correlated with perceived inequity. In addition, partial
 intraclass correlations revealed that if one partner tended to feel
 underbenefited, the other partner tended to feel overbenefited. The results are
 explained on the basis of the agentic model of narcissism. All three studies
 consistently revealed a gender effect indicating that women felt more
 underbenefited than men in terms of attractiveness.</p><ul>
	<li><span class="labelName">Content Type </span><span class="labelValue">Journal Article</span></li><li>Category Original Articles and Reviews</li><li>DOI 10.1027/1016-9040/a000025</li><li><span class="labelName">Authors</span><ul>
		<li>Elke Rohmann, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany</li><li>Hans-Werner Bierhoff, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany</li><li>Martina Schmohr, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany</li>
	</ul></li>
</ul><ul class="parents">
	<ul class="details">
		<li><span class="header labelName">Journal </span><span class="labelValue"><a href="http://www.metapress.com/content/120230/">European Psychologist</a></span></li><li><span class="labelName">Print ISSN </span><span class="labelValue">1016-9040</span></li>
	</ul>
</ul>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.psydir.com/journals/narcissism-and-perceived-inequity-in-attractiveness-in-romantic-relationships</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>When 2 is Better Than 1 + 1</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="abstract">Little is known about older spousal dyads’ collaborative problem
 solving. Although typically collaborating dyads perform worse than nominal dyads
 in other dyadic cognition tasks, we assumed that older couples might profit from
 collaboration in a highly demanding problem-solving task requiring the
 sequential and complementary use of spatial memory and reasoning abilities. In
 this paper, we examine whether older couples profit from the dyadic situation on
 a computer-based problem-solving task that can most likely be optimally solved
 when dyads manage to distribute responsibilities between the spatial memory
 demands and the reasoning demands of the task. In 50 married couples consisting
 of <i>N</i> = 100 older individuals (<i>M</i> = 67.3 years,
 <i>SD</i> = 4.9), we tested the hypothesis that compared to their
 own individual performance, compared to repeated individual performance of a
 control group (<i>N</i> = 41, <i>M</i> = 66.0 years,
 <i>SD</i> = 3.8), and compared to nominal pairs (same 100
 participants as in the experimental group), older couples would show the best
 performance on the task. The comparison of individual versus dyadic
 problem-solving performance demonstrates that dyads consisting of old spouses
 outperform old individuals as well as nominal pairs on the problem-solving task.
 Our results suggest that older familiar dyads are expert collaborators whose
 collaborative expertise might be able to overcome individual deficits in
 problem-solving skills through dyadic cognition.</p><ul>
	<li><span class="labelName">Content Type </span><span class="labelValue">Journal Article</span></li><li>Category Original Articles and Reviews</li><li>DOI 10.1027/1016-9040/a000024</li><li><span class="labelName">Authors</span><ul>
		<li>Melanie Peter-Wight, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich,
 Switzerland</li><li>Mike Martin, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich,
 Switzerland</li>
	</ul></li>
</ul><ul class="parents">
	<ul class="details">
		<li><span class="header labelName">Journal </span><span class="labelValue"><a href="http://www.metapress.com/content/120230/">European Psychologist</a></span></li><li><span class="labelName">Print ISSN </span><span class="labelValue">1016-9040</span></li>
	</ul>
</ul>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.psydir.com/journals/when-2-is-better-than-1-1</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Adjustment of Couples Following Childbirth</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="abstract">This study focuses on the changes in perception of dyadic adjustment following
 childbirth and on the role of attachment (as a risk or protection factor) in the
 way partners adjust to this stressful event. Four attachment configurations were
 analyzed which emerged from the concordance or discordance between the
 “generalized” and the “specific”
 states of mind in the individual, and a longitudinal and cross-sectional study
 on <i>N =</i> 206 participants (104
 “new-parents” and 102 “nonparents by
 choice”) was then implemented. These results showed that individuals
 who became parents had lower dyadic adjustment levels than nonparents (Lrtest =
 395.03; <i>p</i> &#60; .001). This decline in values seemed to be
 more pronounced for the “affectional expression” subscale
 (<i>b</i> = −3.69) and suggests that in our sample the
 expression of love toward a partner might be particularly subject to stress due
 to the arrival of a child. Considering the role played in the attachment
 configuration of each individual, a significant effect upon
 InsecureGEN/InsecureSPEC individuals was
 found (<i>p</i> = .015). This then would seem to indicate that these
 individuals might be more vulnerable to perceiving worse adjustment levels
 during the transition to first-time parenthood.</p><ul>
	<li><span class="labelName">Content Type </span><span class="labelValue">Journal Article</span></li><li>Category Original Articles and Reviews</li><li>DOI 10.1027/1016-9040/a000022</li><li><span class="labelName">Authors</span><ul>
		<li>Patrizia Velotti, Department of Dynamical and Clinical Psychology, University of Rome
 “La Sapienza,” Italy</li><li>Rosetta Castellano, Department of Dynamical and Clinical Psychology, University of Rome
 “La Sapienza,” Italy</li><li>Giulio Cesare Zavattini, Department of Dynamical and Clinical Psychology, University of Rome
 “La Sapienza,” Italy</li>
	</ul></li>
</ul><ul class="parents">
	<ul class="details">
		<li><span class="header labelName">Journal </span><span class="labelValue"><a href="http://www.metapress.com/content/120230/">European Psychologist</a></span></li><li><span class="labelName">Print ISSN </span><span class="labelValue">1016-9040</span></li>
	</ul>
</ul>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.psydir.com/journals/adjustment-of-couples-following-childbirth</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Prediction and Explanation of Young Offenders’ Intentions to Re-offend From Behavioral, Normative, and Control Beliefs</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="abstract">A detailed assessment of the constructs postulated by the Theory of Planned
 Behavior is offered as a comprehensive framework for understanding young
 offenders’ behavioral intentions to re-offend in the future. The
 paper reports the assessed salient behavioral, normative, and control beliefs
 with respect to future offending behavior. From the largest institution for
 young offenders in Scotland 152 male inmates were randomly selected and filled
 in a questionnaire which measured direct and belief-based attitudes, subjective
 norms, perceived behavioral control, and intentions to re-offend in the future.
 Intentions to re-offend in the future by young offenders were predicted by
 control beliefs about certain internal and external impediments that the young
 offenders believed they had to overcome and behavioral beliefs, underlining
 attitudes toward future offending.</p><ul>
	<li><span class="labelName">Content Type </span><span class="labelValue">Journal Article</span></li><li>Category Original Articles and Reviews</li><li>DOI 10.1027/1016-9040/a000021</li><li><span class="labelName">Authors</span><ul>
		<li>Stavros P. Kiriakidis, Department of Social and Educational Policy, University of Macedonia,
 Thessaloniki, Greece</li>
	</ul></li>
</ul><ul class="parents">
	<ul class="details">
		<li><span class="header labelName">Journal </span><span class="labelValue"><a href="http://www.metapress.com/content/120230/">European Psychologist</a></span></li><li><span class="labelName">Print ISSN </span><span class="labelValue">1016-9040</span></li>
	</ul>
</ul>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.psydir.com/journals/prediction-and-explanation-of-young-offenders%e2%80%99-intentions-to-re-offend-from-behavioral-normative-and-control-beliefs</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Strategic Expression of Personal Belief in a Just World</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="abstract">Previous research has shown that both the personal and the general belief in a
 just world (BJW) are judgment norms. This finding raises the possibility of a
 strategic component in the expression of the BJW. In the two studies reported in
 this article we investigated this possibility, specifically that the expression
 of BJW could be used to distinguish oneself from others and to convey specific
 images. In Study 1, we asked participants to fill in the personal and the
 general BJW scales on their behalf and according to the way they thought that
 their classmates would. The results showed that personal BJW was used as a
 device to distinguish the self from others. In Study 2 we asked the participants
 to fill in both BJW scales either according to their opinion or in order to
 convey a specific image: being likable, competent, successful, or pitiful. The
 results showed that personal BJW scores in the control condition and in all
 positive image conditions were higher than those in the “pitiful
 image” condition. In the case of general BJW the same pattern only
 showed up when scores of personal BJW were not controlled for.</p><ul>
	<li><span class="labelName">Content Type </span><span class="labelValue">Journal Article</span></li><li>Category Original Articles and Reviews</li><li>DOI 10.1027/1016-9040/a000020</li><li><span class="labelName">Authors</span><ul>
		<li>Hélder Alves, Centro de Investigação e
 Intervenção Social, Lisbon,
 Portugal</li><li>Isabel Correia, Centro de Investigação e
 Intervenção Social, Lisbon,
 Portugal</li>
	</ul></li>
</ul><ul class="parents">
	<ul class="details">
		<li><span class="header labelName">Journal </span><span class="labelValue"><a href="http://www.metapress.com/content/120230/">European Psychologist</a></span></li><li><span class="labelName">Print ISSN </span><span class="labelValue">1016-9040</span></li>
	</ul>
</ul>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.psydir.com/journals/the-strategic-expression-of-personal-belief-in-a-just-world</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.539 seconds -->
